luckyxstar
Student
Temple Econ Superstar
Posts: 25
|
Post by luckyxstar on Sept 12, 2007 0:36:49 GMT -5
This lack of new threadlessness has gone WAY TOO LONG gosh darn it! OK fine, heres a joke:
*i hope i tell it right*
Ok there was this kid, who turned to his father during dinner and asked, "Daddy, what is politics?"
The father replies, "Politics is a lot like this household: I'm the breadwinner, so that makes me Capitalism. Mommy takes care of house matters, therefore she is the government. The nanny works for us, so she represents the workers. Your the people, and the baby is the future."
Father sent the kid off to bed to make him think about what he said.
In the middle of the night the kid is awoken by the baby and runs off to his parents room to tell his dad, but he is no where to be found, and his mother is sleeping.
He then runs to get the nanny. Only to come to find that his father is in bed screwing the nanny.
So the next morning at breakfast the kid turns to the dad and says, "Dad, i get politics!! CAPITALISM SCREWS ITS WORKERS WHEN THE GOVERNMENT IS SLEEPING, AND THE PEOPLE ARE BEING IGNORED WHILE THE FUTURE IS DEEP IN SHIT!!!"
-- LMAO ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by Steven C. Frable on Sept 12, 2007 14:31:32 GMT -5
Wow. I need to memorize that for the next nerd party I go to. And the reason its so funny, is because its true. If it wasn't for the nanny being a dumb whore then we wouldn't have this problem. ;D
|
|
|
Post by Steven C. Frable on Sept 13, 2007 9:57:34 GMT -5
Ok, I guess its the dads fault for being greedy and heartless. Or maybe the son could rise up and smite daddy and free nanny. Or maybe the mom could just stop sleeping and do something for once. What's interesting is that the only thing that doesn't have any choice to cause an effect on this equation is the baby...or does it?
|
|
luckyxstar
Student
Temple Econ Superstar
Posts: 25
|
Post by luckyxstar on Sept 13, 2007 13:25:39 GMT -5
wow. never thought of that. The baby aka. future is deep in shit because of all of the neglect of the other parties. Only the kid aka the people notice, but unable to change or help.
|
|
|
Post by Steven C. Frable on Sept 14, 2007 14:40:31 GMT -5
I think my point was that maybe the baby can do something unless you think in only rational terms like
Baby = Kid + Father + Nanny + Mommy
Baby is dependent variable while everyone else is the independent. Or maybe I have that confused. Anyway, based on this model, we be screwed.
I think the baby should come back in a timemachine and smite all of them, call himself jesus 2.0 and make us praise him. Then, and only then, can baby save us.
|
|
|
Post by anthonyd on Sept 14, 2007 18:47:55 GMT -5
Haha...I agree with your first comment Steve. The nanny is a dumb whore.
|
|